Cancer is a genetic disease.
When actress Angelina Jolie went well-known about her protection twofold mastectomy, it did not outrun to an increased understanding of the genetic risk of heart of hearts cancer, researchers say. Although it raised awareness of bust cancer, exposure to Jolie's whodunit may have resulted in greater confusion about the connection between a family history of breast cancer and increased cancer risk, according to the study, published Dec 19, 2013 in the fortnightly Genetics in Medicine generic. Earlier this year, Jolie revealed that she had both breasts removed after lore that she carried a variation in a gene called BRCA1 that is linked to soul and ovarian cancers.
Women with mutations in that gene and the BRCA2 gene have a five times higher jeopardy of chest cancer and a 10 to 30 times higher hazard of developing ovarian cancer than those without the mutations. For the study, researchers surveyed more than 2500 Americans. About 75 percent were au courant of Jolie's story, the investigators found vitoviga.eu. But fewer than 10 percent of the respondents could correctly correlate with questions about the BRCA gene transfiguration that Jolie carries and the conventional woman's chance of developing tit cancer.
So "Ms Jolie's salubrity scenario was prominently featured throughout the media and was a unpremeditated to activate fettle communicators and educators to discipline about the nuanced issues around genetic testing, endanger and preventive surgery," study be ahead author Dina Borzekowski, a research professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Health's unit of behavior and community health, said in a university scuttlebutt release. However, it "feels in the same way as it was a missed break to educate the supporters about a complex but rare health situation," she added.
About half of the over respondents incorrectly thoughtfulness that a lack of family history of cancer was associated with a lessen than average personal risk. Among common man who had at least one close relative elaborate cancer, those who knew about Jolie's experience were less acceptable than those unaware of her story to estimate their own cancer peril as higher than average, 39 percent versus 59 percent. That's a concern, another researcher said.
And "Since many more women without a species days of yore display breast cancer each year than those with, it is vital that women don't believe falsely reassured by a negative family history," workroom co-author Dr Debra Roter, overseer of the Center for Genomic Literacy and Communication at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in the front-page news release. The researchers also found that 57 percent of women who knew about Jolie's gag said they would have equivalent surgery if they knew they had a damaged BRCA gene.
Nearly three-quarters of women and men in the inquiry felt Jolie did the sound fad by going public about her experience. Cases of heart cancer linked to a BRCA gene transfiguring are extremely rare. In the United States, a woman's imperil of ever getting core cancer if she does not have a BRCA mutation is between 5 percent and 15 percent yourvito.com. While celebrities can daily nurture awareness of health issues by sharing their own experiences, it's influential to assist the public understand and use the information about diagnosis and curing contained in these stories, the researchers concluded.
No comments:
Post a Comment